Drawing for MPV

USPTO serial 76495938

MPV

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHOE, KELLY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MPV?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David L. Sigalow

DAVID L SIGALOW ALLEN, DYER, DOPPELT, MILBRATH255 S ORANGE AVE STE 1401ORLANDO, FL 32801UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Consumer audio, image, and video playback devices, namely CD players and DVD players and memory card players and hard disk drive players; optical media, namely, blank compact discs and digital versatile discs and prerecorded compact discs and prerecorded digital versatile discs featuring music, pictures, live performances, entertainment and motion pictures; consumers audio, image, and video recording devices, namely CD recorders and DVD recorders and digital cameras; consumer audio, image, and video disc recording software applications, namely software applications that manage audio, image, and video content and record it to recordable CD and DVD; consumer audio, image, and video content transfer applications, namely software applications that manage audio, image, and video content and transfer it onto portable storage media such as memory cards and removable hard disk drivesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 7, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 23, 2007EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 23, 2007EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Feb 23, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 21, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 21, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 21, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 21, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 19, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 14, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 14, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 14, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 24, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 24, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 24, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 18, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 4, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 4, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 24, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 1, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 12, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 31, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 23, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 18, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance