USPTO serial 76496301
TRIGILD INTERNATIONAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TRIGILD INTERNATIONAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William E. Van Valkenberg, Esq.
WILLIAM E VAN VALKENBERG ESQ HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP2600 PIKE TWR520 PIKE STSEATTLE, WA 98101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising and promotion services; information services; business information services; business management services; business administration services; office functions; business advisory services; business management advisory services; business management advisory services relating to the setting up and running of commercial and industrial enterprises; business appraisals; business consultancy services; business investigations; business management and organization consultancy; commercial and industrial management assistance; management assistance; management consultancy services; appraisals; advisory services relating to the establishment and operation of franchises; management of businesses; business risk management services; advisory services in connection with the acquisition and liquidation of businesses; business organization services; business planning services; advisory services in relation to the corporate structure of businesses; advisory services in relation to company performance; advisory services in relation to product development and manufacture; marketing services; preparation of written strategy reports and preparation of written cost/benefit justification reports; management advice; business publicity materials; business appraisals, enquiries, research and investigations; dissemination of advertising matter; business management administration, information and research services; commercial information agency services; business organization and management consultancy; economic forecasting; market research and studies; project management services; preparation and publication of publicity texts; business research services; information, advisory, and consultancy services relating to the aforesaid services; and including such services provided on-line or via the medium of the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Services related to the hospitality industry, namely franchising, hotel management, property management, and other related services; information, advisory, and consultancy services relating to the aforesaid services; and including such services provided on-line or via the medium of the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 28, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |