USPTO serial 76496998
DVDKEY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, REBECCA A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DVDKEY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Connie L. Ellerbach
CONNIE L ELLERBACH FENWICK & WEST LLPSILICON VALLEY CTR801 CALIFORNIA STMOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | providing information via a web site in the fields of entertainment and music, namely music artists, actors, movies, motion picture films, music videos and other audio-visual works, and discounts, discount coupons and contests relating to music artists, actors, movies, motion picture films, music videos and other audio-visual works; and providing links to web sites of others featuring entertainment and music, namely music artists, actors, movies, motion picture films, music videos and other audio-visual works, and discounts, discount coupons and contests relating to music artists, actors, movies, motion picture films, music videos and other audio-visual works | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 1, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 4, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 31, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 8, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 19, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 4, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 4, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 16, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 23, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 3, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 13, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 7, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |