Drawing for DURA WORLDCLASS CABLES

USPTO serial 76497053

DURA WORLDCLASS CABLES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DURA WORLDCLASS CABLES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CASIMIR R KICZEK

CASIMIR R KICZEK DURA AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS2791 RESEARCH DRROCHESTER HILLS, MI 48309UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012TRADITIONAL FOOT AND HAND PARK BRAKE CABLES, ELECTRIC PARK BRAKE CABLES, SPEED CONTROL CABLES, THROTTLE CABLES, TRUNK RELEASE CABLES, FUEL FILLER DOOR CABLES, BRAKE CABLES, SEATING CABLES, WINDOW REGULATOR CABLES, MANUAL AND POWER LIFTGATE CABLES, TAILGATE LATCH CABLES, HOOD RELEASE CABLES, DECK LID CABLES, TRANSFER CASE CABLES, SHIFTER CONTROL CABLES, FUEL LID CABLES, DOOR RELEASE CABLES, HEATER AND VENT CONTROL CABLES, KEY BRAKE INTERLOCK CABLES, TIRE CARRIER CABLES, TIRE TETHER CABLES, MECHANICAL ACTUATION CABLES, SLIDING GLAZING CABLES, DROP DOOR GLAZING CABLES, AND NON ELECTRIC CABLES FOR AUTOMOTIVE, RECREATIONAL VEHICLE, HEAVY DUTY TRUCK AND BUS VEHICLESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 13, 2006UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Jun 20, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 20, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 18, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 26, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 6, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 14, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 10, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 14, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 20, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 20, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 27, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 27, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 23, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 5, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance