Drawing for NONPROFIT LAW CENTER

USPTO serial 76497188

NONPROFIT LAW CENTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2932020Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 8, 2005
Examiner
LORENZO, GEORGE M
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with NONPROFIT LAW CENTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

I. Edward Marquette

I EDWARD MARQUETTE SNR DENTON US LLPP.O. Box #061080Chicago, IL 60606-1080

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Educational services, namely, conducting classes, seminars, conferences and workshops in the field of managing and operating nonprofit and tax exempt organizations and furnishing via the global computer network outlines and articles discussing and summarizing current developments in the fields of tax exemption law, unrelated business taxable income, private foundations, charitable giving and fundraising regulation; summaries of and commentaries on court opinions in the exempt organizations field; legislative and regulatory news and book reviewsSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJul 17, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 21, 2012C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Dec 18, 2010CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Dec 18, 2010APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 14, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2005R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Nov 10, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 5, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 5, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 4, 2004CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Jul 14, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 21, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 6, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 4, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 3, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 2, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance