Drawing for CONCISE

USPTO serial 76497208

CONCISE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HAYES, GINA CLARK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CONCISE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas C. Saitta

THOMAS C SAITTA ROGERS TOWERS BAILEY JONES & GAY, PA1301 RIVERPLACE BLVD STE 1500JACKSONVILLE, FL 32207UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042COURT REPORTING SERVICESACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 11, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 11, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 26, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jul 26, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jul 26, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 18, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Feb 1, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Feb 1, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 4, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jul 19, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jul 19, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 10, 2004DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Feb 12, 2004DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Feb 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 9, 2004EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Feb 3, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 11, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 22, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 12, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 18, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 18, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 8, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 8, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance