CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for SANITAIRE EXPERT

USPTO serial 76497232

SANITAIRE EXPERT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SANITAIRE EXPERT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHAEL W GARVEY

MICHAEL W GARVEY PEARNE & GORDON LLP1801 E 9TH ST STE 1200CLEVELAND, OH 44114-3108UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007ELECTRIC VACUUM CLEANERS AND PARTS THEREOFACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 5, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 5, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 3, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 11, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 21, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 7, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 6, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 1, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 29, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 28, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 27, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 13, 2005UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 29, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 29, 2004ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 17, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 17, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 10, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 31, 2004TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 24, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 24, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 3, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 3, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 3, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 2, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 2, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance