USPTO serial 76497239
ADPLEX·RHODES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WOOD, CAROLINE
- Law office
- PHOTOCOMP COORDINATOR
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ADPLEX·RHODES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lester L. Hewitt
LESTER L HEWITT AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP1111 LOUISIANA ST 44TH FLHOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for management of merchandising and advertising workflow in the field of retail and merchandising workflow systems, media asset management and collaborative workflow and online advertising and marketing templating systems | ABANDONED | Dec 6, 2002 |
| 035 | Advertising, namely, providing advertising, marketing and promotional services for others; business consultation in the nature of marketing to target customers; promoting retail and consumer businesses through the development and distribution of printed and audio promotional materials; direct mail consultation services | ABANDONED | Dec 6, 2002 |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software for management of merchandising and advertising workflow in the field of retail and merchandizing workflow systems, media asset management and collaborative workflow and online advertising and marketing templating systems | ABANDONED | Dec 6, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Windward Print Star, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Windward Print Star, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ADPLEX·RHODES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | ISIC | WITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - INCOMING CORR RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 31, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 9, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 2, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 2, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 4, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 2, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 18, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 19, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |