Drawing for MOUNTAIN BROOK VINEYARDS

USPTO serial 76497296

MOUNTAIN BROOK VINEYARDS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAPPENFIELD, ANN
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MOUNTAIN BROOK VINEYARDS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bruce E. Stutsman, Esq.

BRUCE E STUTSMAN ESQ STUTSMAN & THAMES PA121 W FORSYTH ST STE 600JACKSONVILLE, FL 32202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033wineACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 10, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 10, 2006COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 10, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 26, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 26, 2006DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 4, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 14, 2006DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Mar 14, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 30, 2005TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Nov 30, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 30, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 30, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 28, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 13, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 13, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 29, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 13, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 13, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 20, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 31, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 12, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 12, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 1, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 10, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 15, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance