CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for YOUNG DAVINCIS

USPTO serial 76497344

YOUNG DAVINCIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FINK, GINA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with YOUNG DAVINCIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James F. McKeown, Esq.

JAMES F MCKEOWN ESQ CROWELL & MORING LLPPO BOX 14300WASHINGTON, DC 20044-4300UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Nutritional supplements; nutritional fortified beveragesACTIVE—
009Educational children's video and audio tapesACTIVE—
029Foods, namely, pre-packaged meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry, or vegetables; and snack foods, namely, candied fruit snacks, fruit-based, soy-based, and potato-based snack foods, protein-based, nutrient-dense snack bars, and snack mix consisting primarily of processed fruits, nuts, and/or raisinsACTIVE—
041Educational services, namely, conducting in-person and online seminars, conferences, and workshops on the subject of teaching methods for children and young adults, unique learning methods, thinking, creativity and reasoning skills; and distribution of related course materials in connection therewithACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 25, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 25, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 21, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 27, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 7, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 24, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 21, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 21, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 21, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 21, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 23, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 21, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 19, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 19, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 19, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 19, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 18, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 18, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 13, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 25, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 21, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 2, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 10, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 17, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 1, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 28, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 26, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance