Drawing for A&D AERO DROME

USPTO serial 76497417

A&D AERO DROME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with A&D AERO DROME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mr. George Chen

MR GEORGE CHEN BACON & THOMAS, PLLC625 SLATES LN FOURTH FLALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-1176UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018WALLETS; BAGS, NAMELY, ALL PURPOSE SPORT BAGS, ALL-PURPOSE ATHLETIC BAGS, ANIMAL GAME BAGS, ATHLETIC BAGS, BARREL BAGS, BEACH BAGS, BOOK BAGS, BOSTON BAGS, CARRY-ON BAGS, CLUTCH BAGS, COSMETIC BAGS SOLD EMPTY, DIAPER BAGS, DUFFEL BAGS, FEEDBAGS FOR ANIMALS, GARMENT BAGS FOR TRAVEL, GYM BAGS, HUNTERS' GAME BAGS, LEATHER BAGS FOR MERCHANDISE PACKAGING, LEATHER SHOPPING BAGS, MESH SHOPPING BAGS, OVERNIGHT BAGS, ROLL BAGS, SCHOOL BAGS, SCHOOL BOOK BAGS, SHAVING BAGS SOLD EMPTY, SHOE BAGS FOR TRAVEL, SHOPPING BAGS WITH WHEELS ATTACHED, SHOULDER BAGS, SOUVENIR BAGS, SPORTSMAN'S HUNTING BAGS, SUIT BAGS, TEXTILE SHOPPING BAGS, TOOL BAGS SOLD EMPTY, TOTE BAGS, TRAVEL BAGS, TRAVELING BAGS, AND WRIST MOUNTED CARRYALL BAGS; SACKS, NAMELY, RUCKSACKS; HANDBAGS; MOUNTAINEERING BAGS; CAMPING BAGS; UMBRELLAS; PARASOLS; AND GOLF PARASOLSACTIVE—
025suit, coats, shoes, scarves, neckties, hats, sports socks, decorative or cold-proof gloves, decorative cloth or leather belt, and apronsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 14, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 14, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 28, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 12, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 12, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 4, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 12, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 12, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 12, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 20, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 30, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 3, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 26, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 5, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 5, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 5, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 2, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance