USPTO serial 76497510
KRISTALL SETTING LIGHT TO DIAMONDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOINIERE, MONIQUE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KRISTALL SETTING LIGHT TO DIAMONDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL A. PAINTER, ESQ.
MICHAEL A PAINTER ESQ ISAACMAN, KAUFMAN & PAINTER8484 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 850BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90211UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | precious metals and their alloys and goods in precious metals or coated therewith, namely, jewelry, precious gemstones, rings, bracelets, earrings, necklaces, pendants, cuff links, all made in whole or substantial part of diamonds; horological and chronometrical instruments, namely, clocks, watches and chronometers, all made in whole or substantial part of diamonds; ashtrays and powder compacts made of precious metals, all made in whole or substantial part of diamonds | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 24, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 28, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 30, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |