USPTO serial 76497677
JUICY GIRL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BIBBINS, ODESSA
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JUICY GIRL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gene Bolmarcich
GENE BOLMARCICH LIZ CLAIBORNE INCHQ2 7TH FL1 CLAIBORNE AVENORTH BERGEN, NJ 07047Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics, namely skin soaps, cosmetics, perfumery, essential oils for personal use, hair lotions, dentifrices, perfume, eau de toilette, body splash, after-shave gel and lotions, body lotions, body scrubs, bath soaps, bubble baths, bath oils, bath and shower gels, hair shampoo, hair conditioner, hair spray, non-medicated hair treatment lotion, facial masks, sun screens, skin moisturizers, body gels, lip gloss, lipstick, blush, eye shadows, mascara, eyeliner, foundation makeup, compacts, nail polish, nail polish remover, body powder, and talc lotion | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Travis Jeans, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by L.C. LICENSING, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by L.C. LICENSING, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named JUICY GIRL
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 22, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 9, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 1, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 1, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 3, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 9, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 3, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 13, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 3, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 11, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 21, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 16, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |