USPTO serial 76498826
PRESTIGE GROUP, INC.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRENCH, CURTIS W
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PRESTIGE GROUP, INC.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Wholesale product distribution services, namely, the following products-- dried food products including olive oil, dried apricot, dried fig, dried mango, dried papaya, dried pineapple, pitted dates, raisins, dried banana chips, dried green peas, roasted corn, dried chickpeas, sunflower seeds, pistachio nuts, walnuts, almonds, cashews, pecans, oriental rice crackers, trail mixes, tropical island mixes, sesame mixes, snack mixes, yogurt pretzels, chocolate pretzels, toasted bread, tea biscuits, wafers, chocolate drink mixes, tea, coffee, honey, fruit chew candies, lollipops, chocolates, hazelnut chocolates, caramel chocolates, tomato sauce, tomato paste, pepper sauce, hot sauce, pomegranate sauce, vinegar, mayonnaise, pickles, spaghetti, linguini, ziti, lasagna, angel hair pasta, macaroni; personal care products including shampoos, conditioner, shower gels, hair gels, hair spray, hair cream, hand cream, baby oil, baby cream, baby powder, bar soaps, liquid soaps, toilet paper; household cleaning products including window cleaners, kitchen cleaners, general purpose surface cleaners, toilet cleaners, strong dissolvers, blocked sink openers, liquid bleaches, fabric softeners, dishwashing liquids, liquid hand soaps, ironing starch, iron water, lime removers, garbage bags, paper towels; odor absorbers including air freshner sprays, air freshner gels, refrigerator freshners, odor block freshners, closet block freshners, toilet block freshners, moth repellants; non poisonous glue traps; other products including area rugs, blankets, and carpet cleaners | ACTIVE | Jun 4, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 22, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 24, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2004 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |