Drawing for LITERATI CAFE

USPTO serial 76499332

LITERATI CAFE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ALI, STEPHANIE MARIE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with LITERATI CAFE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel M. Cislo

DANIEL M CISLO CISLO & THOMAS LLP233 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 900SANTA MONICA, CA 90401-1211UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016cardboard carriers for food and beveragesACTIVEJun 1, 2000
021drinking glasses and glasswareACTIVEJun 1, 2000
025T-Shirts, hats, baseball hats; sweatshirts; pants, and footwearACTIVEJun 1, 2000
029milk-based beverage containing coffeeACTIVE—
030other foodstuffs of plant origin, namely, ground and whole bean coffee; cocoa; herbal and non-herbal teas, tea leaves, fruit tea, herbal tea, herbal tea blends, flavored tea, coffee, tea, cocoa and espresso beverages, and beverages made with a base of coffee and/or espresso, instant coffee and coffee substitutes; ready-to-drink coffee beverages; flavoring syrups for beverages; baked goods, namely, muffins, scones, biscuits, biscotti, cookies, pastries and breads and ready-to-make mixes of the same; granola; ice cream and frozen confections; chocolate; candy and confections and ready-to-eat cereals; sherbet, sorbet, flavored ices and frozen confections; ready-to-drink coffee, ready-to-drink coffee based beverages; combination gift packages composed of the foregoing goods; food additives for non-nutritional purposes for use as a flavoring, ingredient or fillerACTIVEJun 1, 2000
032other non-alcoholic drinks, namely, fruit juices and fruit drinks; preparations for making beverages, namely, mineral water; flat water; lemonade; orange juice; grapefruit juice; guava juice; watermelon juice; iced tea; iced coffee; fruit smoothes; carbonated and non-carbonated soft drinks; concentrates, syrups or powders used in the preparation of soft drinksACTIVEJun 1, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 17, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 17, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 21, 2005CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Mar 18, 2005RECGACTION GRANTING REQ. FOR RECON. MAILED—
Jul 31, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 14, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 27, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 27, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 27, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 15, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 15, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 26, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 10, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance