Drawing for DAEWOO

USPTO serial 76499553

DAEWOO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GRUNDY, JUDITH A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DAEWOO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DANIEL M PRESS

DANIEL M PRESS CHUNG & PRESS PC6723 WHITTIER AVE STE 302MCLEAN, VA 22101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Television receiving sets and television monitors, including CRT, projection, LCD, plasma, PDP, digital, and HDTV sets and monitors; video cassette recorders (VCRs), TV/VCR combinations, VCR players, VCR/DVD combinations, and DVD players; computer peripherals, computer monitors including CRT, LCD and plasma screens; audio systems including compact disk players, audio cassette recorders and players; component stereo systems, stereo tuners, synthesizers, amplifiers, radio receivers, and speakers; and remote controls for radios, televisions, and stereosACTIVEJul 24, 1990

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 2, 2004ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Dec 5, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 5, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 10, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 28, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance