Drawing for SCHEMALOGIC

USPTO serial 76499684

SCHEMALOGIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DWYER, JOHN D
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SCHEMALOGIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SANDRA EPP RYAN

SANDRA EPP RYAN MERCHANT & GOULD PCPO BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software and programs involving data management, data integration, content categorization, information schema, taxonomy, classification, information retrieval and meta data managementACTIVE—
042Professional services including consulting, training, computer programming, business analysis, organizational workflow and knowledge transfer involving data management, data integration, content categorization, information schema, taxonomy, classification, information retrieval and meta data managementACTIVEMar 1, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 24, 2004ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 8, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 8, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 4, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 28, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance