USPTO serial 76499951
SENTRY SECURITY FASTENERS INC.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SENTRY SECURITY FASTENERS INC.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin M. Kercher
KEVIN M KERCHER THOMPSON COBURN LLPONE US BANK PLZSAINT LOUIS, MO 63101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal door frames, keys for locks, cylinders for locks, locks not including combination locks, door closers and door kick plates; metal locking mechanisms and their structural components; and metal window frames, all for wholesale and institutional construction distribution | ACTIVE | Aug 13, 1993 |
| 007 | Power tools and attachments, namely riveting tools, rotary files, drills, taps, dies for use with machine tools, and screwdrivers, all for wholesale and institutional construction distribution | ACTIVE | Sep 3, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2006 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jun 5, 2005 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 25, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 25, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 23, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 17, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 14, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 14, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 10, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 19, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 10, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |