Drawing for SENTRY SECURITY FASTENERS INC.

USPTO serial 76499951

SENTRY SECURITY FASTENERS INC.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SENTRY SECURITY FASTENERS INC.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kevin M. Kercher

KEVIN M KERCHER THOMPSON COBURN LLPONE US BANK PLZSAINT LOUIS, MO 63101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal door frames, keys for locks, cylinders for locks, locks not including combination locks, door closers and door kick plates; metal locking mechanisms and their structural components; and metal window frames, all for wholesale and institutional construction distributionACTIVEAug 13, 1993
007Power tools and attachments, namely riveting tools, rotary files, drills, taps, dies for use with machine tools, and screwdrivers, all for wholesale and institutional construction distributionACTIVESep 3, 1993

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 16, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Mar 15, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 15, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 7, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Oct 20, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2005EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 5, 2005GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 5, 2005CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
May 25, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 25, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 23, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 17, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 14, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 10, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 29, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 29, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 10, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 10, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 10, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance