Drawing for KEY CAPTURE

USPTO serial 76500069

KEY CAPTURE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICHOS, JOHN E
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KEY CAPTURE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher Jordan

198 Champion CourtSan Jose, CA 95134United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware network search enginesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 2, 2024TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2024ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 2, 2024REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2024CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Oct 2, 2024COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2005PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Mar 22, 2005PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Mar 22, 2005ABN0ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Dec 21, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 12, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2004CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Nov 8, 2004CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Oct 18, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 7, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 7, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 12, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 24, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance