Drawing for LATINTIME MUSIC

USPTO serial 76500277

LATINTIME MUSIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HUGHITT, ELIZABETH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LATINTIME MUSIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sandra M. Sovinski

SANDRA M DRUMMOND MYERS & KAPLAN LLC1899 POWERS FERRY RD SE STE 310ATLANTA, GA 30339-5655UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Recorded goods, namely, CD masters, digital tape masters and analog (reel-to-reel) tape masters featuring musical and/or artistic performances, audio cassettes, audio tapes and audio discs featuring musical and/or artistic performer sound recordings, compact discs featuring musical and/or artistic performer sound recordings, digital audio tapes featuring musical and/or artistic performer sound recordings, downloadable musical sound recordings, musical sound recordings, musical video recordings, and phonograph recordings and sound recordings featuring musical and/or artistic performancesACTIVE—
041Entertainment services, namely recording studio services, music publishing services, record master production, audio recording and production, music production, rental of sound recording studios, musical composition for others, song writing services, videotape production, videotape editing services and concert booking servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 17, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 7, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 28, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 14, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 22, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 2, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 13, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 13, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 26, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 26, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 26, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance