Drawing for TEQUILERO

USPTO serial 76500498

TEQUILERO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BOULTON, KELLY F
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TEQUILERO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marie Anne Mastrovito

Marie Anne Mastrovito Abelman Frayne & Schwab666 Third AvenueNew York, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033WINE AND DISTILLED SPIRITSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 17, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 17, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 11, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 6, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 8, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 8, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 12, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 11, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 8, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 8, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 9, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 8, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 8, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 20, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 20, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 11, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 9, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 9, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 9, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 20, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 20, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 9, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 28, 2011TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Jun 28, 2011OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jun 28, 2011OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Jun 22, 2011ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 29, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 27, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 27, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2008OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 23, 2008ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jan 1, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 31, 2007UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Dec 12, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 23, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 21, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 31, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 31, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 31, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 25, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 7, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 1, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 31, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 30, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 25, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 25, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 21, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 21, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 20, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 29, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 21, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 21, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 6, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 26, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance