Drawing for SATAMBULANCE

USPTO serial 76500541

SATAMBULANCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YARD, JOHN S
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SATAMBULANCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marvin H. Kleinberg

Marvin H. Kleinberg Kleinberg & Lerner, LLPSuite 10802049 Century Park EastLos Angeles, CA 90067

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Customized motor vehicles, namely, funny cars and wheelie carsACTIVEJun 15, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 8, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 8, 2007COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2007MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jun 20, 2007ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jun 19, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jun 8, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 8, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2006CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 22, 2006SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 10, 2006IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Oct 10, 2006EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jun 7, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 7, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 7, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 7, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 13, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 13, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 13, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 12, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 10, 2005TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Oct 10, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 10, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 28, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 13, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 5, 2005TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Apr 5, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 5, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 13, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 13, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 20, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 31, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 24, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 24, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 28, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 25, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance