USPTO serial 76500701
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey M. Vincent
JEFFREY M VINCENT JEFFREY M. VINCENT7090 S UN PARK AVE STE 200SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84106UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software to enable networking and connection to the Internet, corporate networks, and global computer networks | ACTIVE | Mar 11, 2003 |
| 037 | Installation of computer and networking hardware and peripheral equipment to enable multi-user access to the Internet, corporate networks, and global computer networks | ACTIVE | Mar 11, 2003 |
| 038 | Computer services to enable multi-user access to the Internet, corporate networks, and global computer networks | ACTIVE | Mar 11, 2003 |
| 042 | Installation and maintenance of computer software, and network support and computer consultation services, for multi-user access to the Internet, virtual private networks, Intranets, or computer information networks, through wireless or wire-based facilities | ACTIVE | Mar 11, 2003 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 29, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |