USPTO serial 76501387
FALAK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3220384Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 20, 2007
- Examiner
- HAYES, GINA CLARK
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FALAK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MATCO RICE PROCESSING (PVT) LTD.
Karachi, PK
MATCO RICE PROCESSING (PVT) LTD.
Karachi, PK
MATCO RICE PROCESSING (PVT) LTD.
Karachi, PK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DONN K. HARMS
MATCO RICE PROCESSING (PVT) LTD. MATCO RICE PROCESSING (PVT) LTD.L-24/1 Blk 21 Federal B Industrial AreaKARACHI, 75950Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Basmati rice; rice; sauces; chutneys; vermicelli; spices; breads; parathas bread | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 30, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MATCO RICE PROCESSING (PVT) LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by MATCO RICE PROCESSING (PVT) LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by MATCO RICE PROCESSING (PVT) LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named FALAK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 24, 2013 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Sep 4, 2013 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Jun 21, 2013 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2013 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2013 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Mar 5, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 28, 2013 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 4, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 12, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 18, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 29, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 26, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 27, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 21, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |