Drawing for INFECTION CONTROL ASSISTANT

USPTO serial 76501668

INFECTION CONTROL ASSISTANT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WAHLBERG, STACY B
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 600: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with INFECTION CONTROL ASSISTANT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian R. Woodworth

Brian R. Woodworth Hospira, Inc.275 North Field DriveDept. NLEG, Bldg. H-1Lake Forest, IL 60045

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer programs and computer software that collect data, screen data, detect problems, identify problems, evaluate data, survey data, monitor, document, report, describe alternatives, analyze alternatives, and make decisions, with respect to medical treatment, medical care, health care, preventative health care, physical therapy, nutritional therapy, drug therapy, surgery recovery therapy, gene therapy, psychological therapy, medical testing, diet, surgery, vaccinations, medications, antibiotics, medical equipment, medical supplies, disease, infectious disease, sickness, infection, infective agents, fever, injury, and medical conditionsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 24, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 24, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 19, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 8, 2004MAB0ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Dec 8, 2004ABN0ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Dec 8, 2004CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Nov 17, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 8, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 8, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 4, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 18, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 18, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance