USPTO serial 76501781
OCEANIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 8, 2009
- Examiner
- CARROLL, DORITT
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with OCEANIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
OCEANIC PRZEDSIEBIORSTWO FARMACEUTYCZNO KOSMETYCZNE SOSZYNSKI WOJCIECH
SOPOT, PL
Other trademarks owned by OCEANIC PRZEDSIEBIORSTWO FARMACEUTYCZNO KOSMETYCZNE SOSZYNSKI WOJCIECH
OCEANIC PRZEDSIEBIORSTWO FARMACEUTYCZNO KOSMETYCZNE SOSZYNSKI WOJCIECH
SOPOT, PL
Other trademarks owned by OCEANIC PRZEDSIEBIORSTWO FARMACEUTYCZNO KOSMETYCZNE SOSZYNSKI WOJCIECH
OCEANIC PRZEDSIEBIORSTWO FARMACEUTYCZNO KOSMETYCZNE SOSZYNSKI WOJCIECH
SOPOT, PL
Other trademarks owned by OCEANIC PRZEDSIEBIORSTWO FARMACEUTYCZNO KOSMETYCZNE SOSZYNSKI WOJCIECH
Soszynski Wojciech OCEANIC Przedsiebiorstwo Farmaceutyczno Kosmetyczne
Sopot, PL
Other trademarks owned by Soszynski Wojciech OCEANIC Przedsiebiorstwo Farmaceutyczno Kosmetyczne
SOPOT, PL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrzej Malarz
111 Brittany CourtClifton, NJ 07013United StatesGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by OCEANIC PRZEDSIEBIORSTWO FARMACEUTYCZNO KOSMETYCZNE SOSZYNSKI WOJCIECH
- Other trademarks owned by OCEANIC PRZEDSIEBIORSTWO FARMACEUTYCZNO KOSMETYCZNE SOSZYNSKI WOJCIECH
- Other trademarks owned by OCEANIC PRZEDSIEBIORSTWO FARMACEUTYCZNO KOSMETYCZNE SOSZYNSKI WOJCIECH
- Other trademarks owned by Soszynski Wojciech OCEANIC Przedsiebiorstwo Farmaceutyczno Kosmetyczne
- Other trademarks owned by OCEANIC SPOLKA AKCYJNA
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named OCEANIC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 2023 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Dec 8, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2023 | EWOR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL AS DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 8, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2020 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2020 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 20, 2020 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 17, 2020 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2020 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Oct 17, 2019 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Oct 16, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 10, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2016 | HSCD | HIDDEN SENSITIVE CONTENT | — |
| Mar 10, 2016 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2016 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Mar 2, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 26, 2016 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2015 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Oct 1, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2015 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Sep 24, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 11, 2015 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 8, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 19, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 13, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 15, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 13, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 20, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 15, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 15, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 4, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2007 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 4, 2007 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | INCS | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR STATEMENT OF USE | — |
| Feb 24, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 24, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 19, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 13, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 29, 2006 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 9, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 17, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 17, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 25, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 10, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 8, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 12, 2003 | 44EA | SEC. 44(E) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Jun 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |