USPTO serial 76501920
MICRO SWITCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, AMY E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MICRO SWITCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David I. Greenbaum
David I. Greenbaum Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.866 United Nations PlazaNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Limit switches, heavy duty limit switches, general purpose limit switches, oiltight limit switches, enclosed basic limit switches, general purpose limit switches, heavy duty snap-action limit switches, standard duty limit switches, medium duty limit switches, compact limit switches, stainless steel limit switches, factory sealed prewired limit switches, enclosed limit switches, global limit switches, explosion proof limit switches, weather sealed explosion proof limit switches, hazardous location limit switches, NEMA limit switches, fully potted limit switches, harsh duty limit switches, miniature limit switches, gravity return limit switches, low torque limit switches, sealed contact limit switches, heavy duty factory sealed 6P limit switches, precision limit switches, plug-in limit switches, full size DIN EN50041 limit switches, miniature size DIN EN 50047 limit switches, international limit switches | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1941 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 2009 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 4, 2009 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 4, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 20, 2009 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 8, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 1, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 26, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 15, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 15, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 23, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 20, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Mar 12, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |