USPTO serial 76502352
VETSCOPE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VETSCOPE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Seminole, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arthur W. Fisher, III
ARTHUR W FISHER III ARTHUR W. FISHER, III PA5553 W WATERS AVE STE 316TAMPA, FL 33634UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | veterinary imaging products, namely digital video camera connected to a tapered probe useful in viewing ear canals or other cavities of animals for diagnosis and treatment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 31, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 8, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 3, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |