USPTO serial 76502695
ADVANTICA EYECARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOLDEN, JAMES B
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ADVANTICA EYECARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daryl S. Caplan, Esquire
DARYL S CAPLAN ESQ LAW OFFICES OF DARYL S. CAPLAN, PC9592 DONNAN CASTLE CTLAUREL, MD 20723UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | MANAGED CARE SERVICES, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC PROCESSING OF VISION CARE INFORMATION | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | ADMINISTRATION OF EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS, PREPAID EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS, AND DISCOUNT FEE-FOR-SERVICES EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS IN THE FIELD OF VISION CARE; INSURANCE AND EMPLOYEE BENEFIT CLAIMS PROCESSING RELATED TO EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS IN THE FIELD OF VISION CARE | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | MANAGED HEALTH CARE SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF VISION CARE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Allied Eyecare, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Allied Eyecare, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named ADVANTICA EYECARE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 28, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 30, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 6, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 13, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 24, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 8, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 6, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |