Drawing for TIMS

USPTO serial 76502974

TIMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOLDEN, JAMES B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TIMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Carl C. Butzer

CARL C BUTZER JACKSON WALKER LLP901 MAIN ST STE 6000DALLAS, TX 75202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Printed publications, namely, pamphlets, brochures, manuals, and proposals relating to residential parking permits, street signs and parking meter management, fleet/rental vehicle management, towed vehicle lot inventory management, citation management, and citation enforcement servicesACTIVE—
035Business services, namely, database management relating to residential parking permits, street signs and parking meter management, fleet/rental vehicle management, towed vehicle lot inventory management, citation management, and citation enforcement servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 10, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 10, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 8, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 8, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 14, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 10, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 10, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 15, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 26, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 14, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 10, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 8, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 7, 2004XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 3, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 3, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 18, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 18, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance