Drawing for MONOPLUS

USPTO serial 76503214

MONOPLUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LOTT, JASON E
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MONOPLUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Simor L. Moskowitz

SIMOR L MOSKOWITZ JACOBSON HOLMAN PLLC400 7TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2237UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Games, namely, board games, card games, and battery-powered computer games with LCD screens which feature animation and sound effectsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 6, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 6, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 7, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 4, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 12, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 22, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 10, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 10, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Nov 5, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 27, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 26, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Oct 26, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Apr 27, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 30, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 30, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 30, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 30, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance