USPTO serial 76503247
MRS. U. S. INTERNATIONAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MILTON, PRISCILLA
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MRS. U. S. INTERNATIONAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Roanoke, VA
Roanoke, VA
Roanoke, VA
Roanoke, VA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James W. Hiney, Esq.
JAMES W. HINEY, ESQ. THE TECHNOLOGY LAW OFFICES OF VIRGINIAP.O. BOX 818MIDDLEBURG, VA 20118UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | promoting the goods and services of others through the medium of pageants and contests conducted on a national and regional basis | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Richardson, Melvin A.
- Other trademarks owned by Richardson, Melvin A.
- Other trademarks owned by Richardson, Mary C.
- Other trademarks owned by Richardson, Mary C.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named MRS. U. S. INTERNATIONAL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 19, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 19, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 23, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 23, 2005 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 30, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 14, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 25, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 30, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |