USPTO serial 76503507
CLOUT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DALIER, JOHN DAVID
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CLOUT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles R. Reeves; C. David Emhardt; Joseph A. Naughton; John V. Moriarty; John C. McNett; Thomas Q. Henry; James M. Durlacher; Vincent O. Wagner; Steve Zlatos; Spiro Bereveskos; R. Randall Frisk; Daniel J. Lueders; Kenneth A. Gandy; Timothy N. Thomas; Ku
CHARLES R REEVES; C DAVID EMHARDT; JOS WOODARD, EMHARDT, MORIARTY, MCNETT & HEN111 MONUMENT CIR STE 3700INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | issuing stored value/cash cards and debit/ DDA cards; installment student and auto loans; insurance administration in the fields of auto, home, health and medical insurance, mortgage lending; and brokerage services in the field of stocks, bonds, commodities and futures | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 6, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 14, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 27, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 27, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 23, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 15, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 6, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 6, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 15, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 23, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 3, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 18, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 9, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |