Drawing for SMART FRAME

USPTO serial 76503625

SMART FRAME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELL, MARLENE D
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMART FRAME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David H. Ben-Meir

VALERIE BRENNAN HOGAN & HARTSON LLP8300 GREENSBORO DR STE 1100BOX INTELLECTUAL PROPERTYMCLEAN, VA 22102-3609

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electrical controllers; Electronic network controllers; User interactive touch pads; Touch screen displays and keypads for controlling electronic devices; and component parts for all of the aforesaid goodsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 25, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 28, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 21, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 14, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 14, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 10, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 10, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 29, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 30, 2004PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Sep 28, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 16, 2004PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
May 27, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 27, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Apr 27, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 5, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance