USPTO serial 76504009
KLYTEA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3009945Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 1, 2005
- Examiner
- SHOSHO II, ERNEST
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with KLYTEA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
92200 Neuilly-Sur-Seine, FR
92200 Neuilly-Sur-Seine, FR
92200 Neuilly-Sur-Seine, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William H. Holt
William H. Holt Law Offices of William H. Holt14584 West Dartmouth AvenueLakewood, CO 80228UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | COFFEE, TEA, COCOA, CHOCOLATE, SUGAR, RICE, TAPIOCA, SAGO, CHICORY BASED ARTIFICIAL COFFEE; FLOUR AND PREPARATIONS MADE FROM PROCESSED CEREAL; PREPARED AND CATERED PASTA-BASED OR RICE-BASED DISHES; BREAD, PASTRY; CONFECTIONERY, NAMELY CONFECTIONERY CHIPS FOR BAKING, CHOCOLATES, TRUFFLES, CHESTNUTS, NOUGATS, CARAMELS, CRYSTALLIZED FRUITS, SUGARED ALMONDS, LOLLIPOPS, CHEWING GUM, BUBBLE GUM, MINTS; FLAVORED ICES; HONEY, TREACLE; YEAST, BAKING POWDER; SALT, MUSTARD; VINEGAR, SAUCES, CONDIMENTS, NAMELY PICKLED GINGER, MAYONNAISE, KETCHUP, RELISH, HOLLANDAISE SAUCE, BEARNAISE SAUCE, TARTAR SAUCE; SPICES; ICE; COFFEE, TEA, COCOA, OR CHOCOLATE-BASED BEVERAGES NOT BEING DAIRY OR VEGETABLE BASED; COFFEE FLAVORINGS; UNROASTED COFFEE; ICED TEA; HERBAL INFUSIONS, TEA FOR INFUSIONS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 9, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 20, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 15, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 9, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 29, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 2, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |