USPTO serial 76504400
CRASH DUMMIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARROLL, DORITT
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CRASH DUMMIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ted F. Gerdes
TED F. GERDES OBLON SPIVAK MCCLELLAND MAIER ET AL1940 DUKE STREETALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Games and playthings, namely, action figures, toy cars, crib toys, puppets, marionette puppets, toy vehicles, radio controlled toy vehicles, model vehicles, play sets for toy vehicles, play set buildings, houses, stand alone video game machines, board games, toy pedal cars, skateboards, toy banks, toy rockets and accessories therefore sold as sets, plush toys, amusement park rides, beach toys, inflatable toys, toy racing sets, in line skates, protective padding for skateboarding and in line skating, toy foam weapons, toy candy dispensers, toy gloves, costume masks, hula dolls, toy goggles, water squirting toys and toy catapults | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2010 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 30, 2010 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 30, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 8, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 6, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 5, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 2003 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |