Drawing for RIPE

USPTO serial 76505164

RIPE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HAYASH, SUSAN C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RIPE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

STEVE D BEYER

STEVE D BEYER BEYER WEAVER & THOMAS LLPPO BOX 70250OAKLAND, CA 94612-0250UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Advertising services, namely interactive and digital media advertising, press advertising, direct mail advertising, production of television commercials, and preparation and placement of television advertisements for othersACTIVE—
042Design services for printing, namely the design of brochures and leaflets, direct mail, signage and press advertising for others; Design consultancy, namely consultancy relating to corporate identity and branding, graphic design, website design and development, corporate presentations, design of CDROMS and DVDs, video and software development, design of point of sale materials, point of purchase materials including 3D and animated designs; Graphic design services, namely websites design and development, design of CDROMS and DVDs, design of point of sale materials, design of point of purchase materials including 3D and animated designsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 26, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 26, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 25, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 7, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Sep 7, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 31, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 19, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 15, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 15, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 15, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 18, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 25, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 5, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 18, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 18, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 18, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 18, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 6, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance