USPTO serial 76505363
PHAT BOOGIE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AMOS, TANYA L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PHAT BOOGIE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin M. Kelleher
KEVIN M KELLEHER BROWN, KELLEHER & ZWICKEL LLP370 MAIN STCATSKILL, NY 12414UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment in the nature of live musical performances featuring a variety of musical groups and entertainers, musical floor shows provided at discotheques and night clubs; entertainment services, namely, providing a website featuring musical performances, musical videos, recordings, related film clips, photographs and other multimedia materials | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF AMERICA, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF AMERICA, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named PHAT BOOGIE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 18, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 1, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 18, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 13, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 11, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 20, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 19, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 27, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 7, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 14, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 13, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |