USPTO serial 76505965
IT IS POSSIBLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMIGA, HOWARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IT IS POSSIBLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Fort Collins, CO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Glenn H. Lenzen
Glenn H. Lenzen Shughart Thomson & Kilroy1050 17th StreetSuite 2300Denver, CO 80265Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Technological devices for assisting persons with sensory or cognitive impairments; clinical and laboratory services; education and training services in the fields of sensory and cognitive impairments; printed materials; publications; video tapes; computer software for use in the fields of sensory and cognitive impairments; research and development services in the fields of sensory and cognitive impairments; promoting public awareness of sensory and cognitive impairments and solutions for those impairments; counseling and consultation services in the fields of sensory and cognitive impairments | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 20, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 5, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |