USPTO serial 76506014
MEDWATCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3811200Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 29, 2010
- Examiner
- SPILS, CAROL A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MEDWATCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
FRESNO COMMUNITY HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER
FRESNO, CA
Other trademarks owned by FRESNO COMMUNITY HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER
FRESNO COMMUNITY HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER
FRESNO, CA
Other trademarks owned by FRESNO COMMUNITY HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER
FRESNO COMMUNITY HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER
FRESNO, CA
Other trademarks owned by FRESNO COMMUNITY HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER
Community Hospitals of Central California
Fresno, CA
Other trademarks owned by Community Hospitals of Central California
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark D. Miller
MARK D MILLER KIMBLE MACMICHAEL & UPTON5260 N PALMSTE 221FRESNO, CA 93704Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Providing news information for the general public in the form of electronic on-line articles and summaries of general non-insurance related health information in the field of medicine, health and wellness via the Internet | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 30, 2003 |
| 044 | Providing general non-insurance related health information for the general public in the field of medicine, health and wellness via the Internet | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 30, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FRESNO COMMUNITY HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER
- Other trademarks owned by FRESNO COMMUNITY HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER
- Other trademarks owned by FRESNO COMMUNITY HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER
- Other trademarks owned by Community Hospitals of Central California
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named MEDWATCH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 25, 2010 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 20, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 27, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 4, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 15, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 27, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 30, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 15, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 29, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 3, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 4, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 4, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 8, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 28, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 28, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |