Drawing for CHICA

USPTO serial 76506454

CHICA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with CHICA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Colin P. Abrahms

COLIN P ABRAHMS COLIN P ABRAHMS ATTORNEY AT LAW5850 CANOGA AVE STE 400WOODLAND HILLS, CA 91367UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, footwear and headgear, namely, shirts, t-shirts, dresses, skirts, pajamas, swim suits, sweatshirts, sweat pants, tank tops, shorts, pants, jackets, sweaters, socks, belts, ski wear, snowboard clothing, namely, snow pants, powder pants, jackets, snow bibs, gloves, thermal wear, shoes, athletic shoes, sandals, slippers, boots, beach footwear, hats, caps, and visorsACTIVEApr 30, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 29, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 2, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 2, 2007ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 2, 2007ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 16, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 23, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 23, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 17, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 17, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 25, 2006PGTTPETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED—
Mar 7, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 6, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 1, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 1, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 11, 2005RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Jul 11, 2005CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jun 17, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 3, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 3, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 30, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 30, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 21, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 13, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 23, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 23, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 20, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 19, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance