USPTO serial 76506454
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
San Fernando, CA
SAN FERNANDO, CA
SAN FERNANDO, CA
SAN FERNANDO, CA
SAN FERNANDO, CA
SAN FERNANDO, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Colin P. Abrahms
COLIN P ABRAHMS COLIN P ABRAHMS ATTORNEY AT LAW5850 CANOGA AVE STE 400WOODLAND HILLS, CA 91367UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, footwear and headgear, namely, shirts, t-shirts, dresses, skirts, pajamas, swim suits, sweatshirts, sweat pants, tank tops, shorts, pants, jackets, sweaters, socks, belts, ski wear, snowboard clothing, namely, snow pants, powder pants, jackets, snow bibs, gloves, thermal wear, shoes, athletic shoes, sandals, slippers, boots, beach footwear, hats, caps, and visors | ACTIVE | Apr 30, 1999 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 2, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 2, 2007 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 2, 2007 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 18, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 25, 2006 | PGTT | PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 11, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 30, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 30, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 21, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 2, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 20, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |