Drawing for SHOWDOWN ONLINE CASINO

USPTO serial 76507380

SHOWDOWN ONLINE CASINO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3152468Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 10, 2006
Examiner
POWERS, ALEXANDER L
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SHOWDOWN ONLINE CASINO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Burton S. Ehrlich

BURTON S EHRLICH LADAS & PARRY LLP224 S MICHIGAN AVENUESUITE 1600CHICAGO, IL 60604

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services, namely, providing on-line games of chance and casino style gamingSECTION 18 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 26, 2016C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
May 26, 2016CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
May 20, 2016CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Oct 10, 2015REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Sep 22, 2014PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Aug 21, 2012NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Aug 21, 2012C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Aug 21, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 1, 2012E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 18, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 28, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 27, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 26, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 19, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 19, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 15, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 15, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 7, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 14, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 13, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 13, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 13, 2004GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 29, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 29, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 22, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 18, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance