USPTO serial 76507996
FAN BELTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FAN BELTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Upper Montclair, NJ
Upper Montclair, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey C. Katz
Jeffrey C. Katz Davis & Gilbert LLP1740 BROADWAYNew York, NY 10019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | belts with buckles that feature photographs or images of celebrities and other famous personalities | ACTIVE | Oct 12, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2007 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 11, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 4, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 4, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 18, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 2, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 12, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 20, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 30, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 4, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |