Drawing for PROGRESSIVE COMPONENTS

USPTO serial 76508001

PROGRESSIVE COMPONENTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMITH, BRIDGETT G
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PROGRESSIVE COMPONENTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Melissa A. Vallone

MELISSA A VALLONE BARNES & THORNBURGPO BOX 2786CHICAGO, IL 60690-2786UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machine parts, namely, pins, bushings, interlocks, sprung core assemblies, side action assemblies, wear plates, L-gibs, mold lifters, retainers, undercut release assemblies, cooling products, cylinders, mold inserts, guides pins blocks, punches, needles, vents, pinch plates, dies, vacuum blocks, recycle inserts, racks spacers, transmission gears, transmission housings ejectors assemblies, cam bearings, date stamps, wear plates, counters recycle inserts, mold straps, support pillars, locating rings, press knock-outs, mold inserts and mold inserts and mold bases for use in connection with blow molding tooling and machines, die casting tooling and machines, and stampingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 17, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 17, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 23, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 15, 2006TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Mar 15, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 15, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 13, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 14, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 14, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 22, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 2, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 16, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 30, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 23, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 30, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 30, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 29, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 24, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance