USPTO serial 76508384
PULSE CLEAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PULSE CLEAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Fountain Valley, CA
Fountain Valley, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Henry M. Bissell
Henry M. Bissell Bissell Law Office6321 Riggs PlaceLos Angeles, CA 90045UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Apparatus for use in cleaning the elements of a fuel delivery mechanism of an automotive engine; structural and replacement parts therefor | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 16, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 28, 2007 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 19, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 19, 2007 | RGSU | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - SOU FILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 15, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 16, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 21, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 18, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 17, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 16, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 31, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 16, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 24, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 4, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 15, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |