Drawing for CATALOGCONNEX

USPTO serial 76508600

CATALOGCONNEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CATALOGCONNEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for use in the automotive repair industry; namely, software featuring programs and computerized databases for inventorying, ordering and providing vehicle parts, including tracking usage and price data, and facilitating electronic communication regarding same throughout the automotive aftermarket industry through transmission of information, data, audio and images via the global computer networkACTIVE—
035Information networking services used to facilitate exchange of information and electronic commerce transactions in the automotive aftermarket industry, namely, proving searchable electronic databases featuring information about the sale of automotive parts; providing information about the availability and sale of automotive parts via a web site on a global computer network; providing searchable electronic databases featuring information, images, prices, suitability and interchangeability of automotive parts, via a web site on a global computer networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 18, 2007WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED—
Oct 18, 2007WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 21, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 21, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 28, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 8, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 28, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 27, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 25, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 13, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jun 27, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 11, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 11, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 26, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 15, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 15, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 3, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 30, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance