USPTO serial 76508698
INTERNATIONAL CYBERTRANS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INTERNATIONAL CYBERTRANS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Carson Stone, III
J CARSON STONE III LAW OFFICE OF J CARSON STONE, III PC209 10TH AVE S STE 325NASHVILLE, TN 37203UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | INDEPENDENT SALES REPRESENTATIVES IN THE FIELD OF ELECTRONIC CREDIT AND DEBIT TRANSACTION SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2007 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Mar 17, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 26, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 8, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 25, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 24, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 1, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 12, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2005 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 8, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 27, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 11, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |