USPTO serial 76508726
MULTIFOCUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FLETCHER, TRACY L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MULTIFOCUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arthur F. Dionne
ARTHUR F DIONNE CITYPLACE IIMCCORMICK PAULDING & HUBER LLP185 ASYLUM STHARTFORD, CT 06103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Roentgen systems, Roentgen apparatus, Roentgen installations and Roentgen tubes not for medical purpose, namely X-ray systems, X-ray apparatus, X-ray installations and their parts for non medical applications, namely X-ray systems for non-destructive testing in science and industry, namely for dimensional measurements in mechanic and electronic devices and components, for the detection, localization and visualization of design deviations and variations, deformations, mechanical defects, cracks, voids, inclusions and impurities in mechanical and electronic devices and components, X-ray apparatus for the analysis and visualization of the internal structure and composition of material specimens; image processing and control software for non-destructive testing with X-ray systems and X-ray tubes, namely for dimensional measurements in mechanic and electronic devices and components, for the detection, localization and visualization of design deviations and variations, deformations, mechanical defects, cracks, voids, inclusions and impurities in mechanical and electronic devices and components, and for the analysis and visualization of the internal structure and composition of material specimens | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Roentgen systems, Roentgen apparatus, Roentgen installations and Roentgen tubes for medical diagnostic on preparations, namely X-ray systems, X-ray apparatus, X-ray installations and their parts for medical applications, namely Roentgen systems for dimensional measurements of the internals of medical, biological and pathological preparations and specimens; X-ray apparatus for the analysis and visualization of the internal structure of medical, biological and pathological preparations and specimens; image processing and control software for X-ray systems and X-ray tubes, namely for dimensional measurements of the internals, the analysis and the visualization of the internal structure and composition of medical, biological and pathological preparations and specimens | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 1, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |