USPTO serial 76509254
DTAR DUNCAN TURNER ACOUSTIC RESEARCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3692912Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 6, 2009
- Examiner
- NELSON, EDWARD
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DTAR DUNCAN TURNER ACOUSTIC RESEARCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SANTA BARBARA, CA
Santa Barbara, CA
Santa Barbara, CA
Santa Barbara, CA
CARTER DUNCAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, L.P.
SANTA BARBARA, CA
Other trademarks owned by CARTER DUNCAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, L.P.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Harold K. Kyle
HAROLD K. KYLE KYLE & ASSOCIATES1583 SPINNAKER DRIVESUITE 209VENTURA, CA 93001Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic sound pick up for guitars and basses and guitar preamplifiers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CARTER DUNCAN HOLDING COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by DTAR, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by DTAR, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by DTAR, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by CARTER DUNCAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, L.P.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named DTAR DUNCAN TURNER ACOUSTIC RESEARCH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2024 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 10, 2024 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 13, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 6, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 1, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 28, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2009 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 24, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 24, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2009 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 19, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 4, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 22, 2008 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 16, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 15, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 25, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |