USPTO serial 76509364
I²T
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with I²T?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CH-6304 Zug, CH
CH-6304 Zug, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert E. Bushnell
Robert E. Bushnell Robert E Bushnell & Law Firm2029 K Street, N.W.Suite 600,Washington DC, DC 20006-1004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | MACHINERY, NAMELY MACHINES AND MACHINE TOOLS FOR CUTTING AND FORMING MATERIALS; MACHINE AND MACHINE TOOLS FOR REMOVING WASTE MATERIAL; MACHINE TOOLS FOR SURFACE FINISHING AND MATERIAL TREATMENT; EMBOSSING MACHINES, AND MICRO-TOOLS | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Scientific, electrical, optical, scales, measuring, signaling, and checking apparatus and instruments, namely apparatus for recording, transmission and reproduction of sound and images; blank electrical, magnetic and optical data carriers, memories and recording disks; data and signal processing equipment and computers, electronic circuits and their components, in particular micro-controllers and microprocessors, semiconductors, semiconductor devices, application specific integrated circuits, electronic memories, ROM's, and EPROM's, substrates, films and other carrier materials for electronic circuits and components; and electrical controllers, electronic motor controllers, and electronic speed controllers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 6, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 2, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 10, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 20, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 17, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 16, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2005 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 23, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |